Print
PDF
5.1 Whether a cost auditor can be appointed as Internal Auditor of
the company. Whether there is any restriction on the cost auditor to accept
assignments from a company where he is the cost auditor.
Refer to MCA General Circular No. 68/2011 dated 30th November 2011. A cost auditor cannot render any services to the company whether acting individually, or through the same firm or through other group firms where he or any partner has any common interest, relating to: (i) design and implementation of cost accounting system; or (ii) the maintenance of cost accounting records, or (iii) act as internal auditor, However, a cost auditor can certify the compliance report or provide any other services as may be assigned by the company, excluding the services mentioned above.
Refer to MCA General Circular No. 68/2011 dated 30th November 2011. A cost auditor cannot render any services to the company whether acting individually, or through the same firm or through other group firms where he or any partner has any common interest, relating to: (i) design and implementation of cost accounting system; or (ii) the maintenance of cost accounting records, or (iii) act as internal auditor, However, a cost auditor can certify the compliance report or provide any other services as may be assigned by the company, excluding the services mentioned above.
5.2 How total number of companies for which
a cost auditor can accept appointment is to be computed keeping in mind
restrictions imposed under Section 224(1B) of the Companies Act 1956.
Refer to MCA Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011. The specified number of companies for the purpose of section 233B (2) read with section 224 (1B) of the Companies Act, 1956 for a given financial year would be the total of: (a) Companies wherein he has been appointed as the cost auditor, (b) Companies wherein he is proposed to be appointed for which he has given his consent. (c) Companies in respect of which cost audit reports have not been submitted and have become overdue. A cost auditor would be deemed to have concluded his appointment as cost auditor and eligible to accept appointment of another company within the limits of Section 224 (1B) as soon as he renders his report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules, as applicable, with a copy to the Company. His obligation to answer queries from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs arising out of review of cost audit reports would not debar him from accepting another appointment as cost auditor of a company provided the specified number of companies contemplated in section 224 (1B) is not exceeded.
Refer to MCA Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011. The specified number of companies for the purpose of section 233B (2) read with section 224 (1B) of the Companies Act, 1956 for a given financial year would be the total of: (a) Companies wherein he has been appointed as the cost auditor, (b) Companies wherein he is proposed to be appointed for which he has given his consent. (c) Companies in respect of which cost audit reports have not been submitted and have become overdue. A cost auditor would be deemed to have concluded his appointment as cost auditor and eligible to accept appointment of another company within the limits of Section 224 (1B) as soon as he renders his report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules, as applicable, with a copy to the Company. His obligation to answer queries from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs arising out of review of cost audit reports would not debar him from accepting another appointment as cost auditor of a company provided the specified number of companies contemplated in section 224 (1B) is not exceeded.
5.3 What is the period for which a cost auditor holds office as
cost auditor of a company?
Refer to MCA Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011. A cost auditor shall be deemed to be holding office as cost auditor from the time he accepts the appointment and files Form 23D with the Central Government and shall be deemed to have concluded his appointment for the relevant financial year as soon as he renders a report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules, as applicable, with a copy to the Company.
Refer to MCA Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011. A cost auditor shall be deemed to be holding office as cost auditor from the time he accepts the appointment and files Form 23D with the Central Government and shall be deemed to have concluded his appointment for the relevant financial year as soon as he renders a report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules, as applicable, with a copy to the Company.
5.4 How and in what manner a cost auditor
is required to sign a cost audit report? Refer to MCA
Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011. In case where a firm of cost accountants is appointed as cost auditors, the Cost Audit Report shall be signed by any one of the partners of the firm responsible for the conduct of cost audit in his own hand alongwith his membership number, for and on behalf of the firm. In case where an individual is appointed as cost auditor, the Cost Audit Report shall be signed by the individual cost auditor in his own hand alongwith his membership number.
Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011. In case where a firm of cost accountants is appointed as cost auditors, the Cost Audit Report shall be signed by any one of the partners of the firm responsible for the conduct of cost audit in his own hand alongwith his membership number, for and on behalf of the firm. In case where an individual is appointed as cost auditor, the Cost Audit Report shall be signed by the individual cost auditor in his own hand alongwith his membership number.
5.5 What is the role of Audit Committee, where applicable, in
dealing with the Cost Audit Report. Can the Annexure to a Cost Audit Report be
approved by the Audit Committee and/or the Board of Directors by circular
resolution.
Refer to MCA Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011.
Sub-section
(6) of section 292A of the Companies Act, 1956 states that the Audit Committee
should have discussions with the auditors periodically about internal control
systems, the scope of audit including the observations of the auditors and
review the half yearly and annual financial statements before submission to the
Board and also ensure compliance on internal control systems. Departmental
Circular No. 6/2001 dated 20.08.2001 has already clarified that the term
“auditors” includes cost auditor and hence “scope of audit including
observations of the auditors” occurring in the above sub-section includes the
scope of cost audit including observations of the cost auditors as well. The
presence of the cost auditor in such committees will ensure overall cost
management, efficiency in resource utilization, business vertical-wise
performance evaluation, proper pricing of inter-unit/inter-company transfers
and valuation of inventories. Hence, the company must place the cost audit
report before the Audit Committee first, which in its duty to ensure compliance
of internal control system shall also discuss the suggestions made in the cost
audit report for implementation, wherever cost audit has been directed under
section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956. The Audit Committee, after due
consideration of the Cost Audit Report is required to submit the same for
approval of the Board. Since the Board of Directors is required to approve the
Annexure to the Cost Audit Report and authorize one of the Directors and the
Company Secretary (two Directors in the absence of a Company Secretary) to sign
the same, the Board should also consider the Cost Audit Report in a duly
convened meeting and it would not be advisable to approve the same by circular
resolution. Refer to MCA Master Circular No. 2/2011 dated 11th November 2011.
5.6 As per MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November
2011, Companies engaged in the production, processing, manufacturing or mining
activities are not covered under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011
till such time they commences their commercial operations. Does it mean
Petroleum Blocks where there is no commercial production of oil or gas are
excluded?
The Cost Accounting Records (Petroleum Industry) Rules 2011 is applicable for companies engaged in Petroleum activity. Survey, Exploration, Exploratory/ Developmental Drilling activities are an integral operation of the Petroleum Industry which may or may not lead to establishment of a producing property resulting in commercial production of oil or gas from the well/block. Hence, companies engaged in Survey, Exploration etc and blocks where such activities are being carried out are covered under Cost Accounting Records (Petroleum Industry) Rules 2011.
The Cost Accounting Records (Petroleum Industry) Rules 2011 is applicable for companies engaged in Petroleum activity. Survey, Exploration, Exploratory/ Developmental Drilling activities are an integral operation of the Petroleum Industry which may or may not lead to establishment of a producing property resulting in commercial production of oil or gas from the well/block. Hence, companies engaged in Survey, Exploration etc and blocks where such activities are being carried out are covered under Cost Accounting Records (Petroleum Industry) Rules 2011.
5.7 What is the applicability of Cost Audit
Order no. 52/26/CAB-2010 dated 2nd May 2011 on
cost audit of Captive Power Generating Plants.
It has been clarified, vide MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, that Generation of electricity for captive consumption is not covered under the above order. For this purpose, the term “Captive Generating Plant” has been defined to have the same meaning as assigned in Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005 which is reproduced below. It may, however, be noted that cost records as required under Cost Accounting Records (Electricity Industry) Rules 2011 are required to be maintained and Compliance Report would be applicable for the Captive Generating Plant, if the final products of the company are not covered under cost audit Requirements of Captive Generating Plant.-
It has been clarified, vide MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, that Generation of electricity for captive consumption is not covered under the above order. For this purpose, the term “Captive Generating Plant” has been defined to have the same meaning as assigned in Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005 which is reproduced below. It may, however, be noted that cost records as required under Cost Accounting Records (Electricity Industry) Rules 2011 are required to be maintained and Compliance Report would be applicable for the Captive Generating Plant, if the final products of the company are not covered under cost audit Requirements of Captive Generating Plant.-
(1) No power plant shall qualify as a ‘captive generating plant’
under section 9 read with clause (8) of section 2 of the Act unless- (a) in
case of a power plant - (i) not less than twenty six percent of the ownership
is held by the captive user(s), and (ii) not less than fifty one percent of the
aggregate electricity generated in such plant, determined on an annual basis,
is consumed for the captive use: Provided that in case of power plant set up by
registered cooperative society, the conditions mentioned under paragraphs at
(i) and (ii) above shall be satisfied collectively by the members of the
co-operative society; Provided further that in case of association of persons,
the captive user(s) shall hold not less than twenty six percent of the
ownership of the plant in aggregate and such captive user(s) shall consume not
less than fifty one percent of the electricity generated, determined on an annual
basis, in proportion to their shares in ownership of the power plant within a
variation not exceeding ten percent; (b) in case of a generating station owned
by a company formed as special purpose vehicle for such generating station, a
unit or units of such generating station identified for captive use and not the
entire generating station satisfy (s) the conditions contained in paragraphs
(i) and (ii) of sub-clause (a) above including - Explanation :- (1) The
electricity required to be consumed by captive users shall be determined with
reference to such generating unit or units in aggregate identified for captive
use and not with reference to generating station as a whole; and
(2) the equity shares to be held by the captive user(s) in the generating station shall not be less than twenty six per cent of the proportionate of the equity of the company related to the generating unit or units identified as the captive generating plant.
5.8 Companies covered under any of the 6 Industry/Product Specific Cost Accounting Records Rules 2011 are also subject to cost audit. Will they be required to file Compliance Report also under these Rules?
(a) (a) If one or more product(s)/activity(s) of a company is covered under cost audit and there are other products that are not covered under Cost Audit as per company-wise cost audit orders issued in the past or industry specific cost audit orders dated 2nd May, 2011 and 30th June, 2011, the Company will be required to file a Compliance Report (Company as a whole) covering products under cost audit and products not under cost audit. (b) If one or more product(s)/activity(s) of a company is covered under Cost Audit and the other product(s)/activity(s) belong to the exempted category, then the company will not be required to file a Compliance Report.
5.9 Are there any sectors exempted under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011?
Please refer MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, which states that the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 are not applicable to wholesale & retail trading, banking, financial, leasing, investment, insurance, education, healthcare, tourism, travel, hospitality, recreation, transport services, business/ professional consultancy, IT & IT enabled services, research & development, postal/courier services, etc. unless any of these have been specifically covered under any other Cost Accounting Records Rules.
5.10 The manufacturing process of a company generates Steel Scrap during production of its main products which may or may not be covered under cost audit. Such scrap is cleared under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff and sold in the market. Will the company be covered under cost audit for generation of scrap?
The company is engaged in manufacture of products and coverage of its main products under cost audit would depend on whether or not such products are covered under company specific cost audit orders issued in the past or industry specific cost audit orders dated 2nd May 2011 or 30th June 2011. The generation of steel scrap is not a production or processing or manufacturing but is incidental to manufacture of its main products. Even though steel scrap, when sold, is liable for payment of excise duty under Chapter 72, still, generation of scrap will not be covered under cost audit.
5.11 A Cost Accountant is in full time employment in a company. He is also holding part time certificate of practice. Whether he can certify the Compliance Report of group companies and/or any other company.
A Cost Accountant and a member of the Institute can certify the Compliance Report of the company where he is a permanent employee. In his capacity as a part-time COP holder, he is neither authorized to certify the Compliance Report of other group companies nor any other company.
5.12 Whether Laminates made from Kraft paper covered under Chapter 48 of Central Excise Tariff Act is covered under Cost Audit?
Since Laminates made from Kraft Paper are paper based products covered under Chapter 48 of Central Excise Tariff Act, the same is covered under Cost Audit as per cost audit order dated 30th June 2011 read with MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011.
5.13 "Paints and Varnishes" under Chapter 32 of Central Excise Tariff are covered under Cost Audit vide order no. F.No.52/26/CAB-2010 dated 30th June, 2011. Paints, Coatings and Printing Ink etc. sold under various trade names are produced by using Varnish as primary raw material to which different Pigments are added in different qualities. These products also belong to Chapter 32 of Central Excise Tariff. Whether such products would be considered as "Allied Products" of Varnish and be covered under cost audit?
As per cost audit order dated 30th June, 2011, Paints & Varnish along with their "Intermediate" and "Articles and Allied Products" thereof are covered under cost audit. In the MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, the terms "Intermediate" and "Articles and Allied Products" have been defined. In view of this clarification, the items produced from Varnish are covered under cost audit irrespective of trade name under which it is sold, provided they meet the criteria laid down in the said circular.
5.14 Para 9 of the Companies (Cost Audit Report) Rules 2011 requires disclosure of “Cost of Production” and “Cost of Sales” at a company level. How the same would be available when all the products/ activities are not covered under cost audit?
The Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011 [CARR] is now applicable to all companies engaged in production, processing, manufacturing & mining. Hence, product-wise/ activity-wise cost of production and cost of sales would be available from the Cost Accounting Records of all the products/ activities, irrespective of whether these are covered under cost audit or not. It may further be noted that in such a situation, the company would also be required to file a compliance report and for this purpose, product-wise/ activity-wise cost of production and cost of sales would be determined to prepare the reconciliation statement as required in the compliance report. 5.15 Whether there is any sequence of filing compliance report and cost audit report for a company which is required to file both?
Compliance report and Cost Audit Report are mutually exclusive to each other and it does not make any difference as to which report is submitted first.
5.16 Whether separate Form 23C is required to be filed by a company having two or more different types of products covered under cost audit?
The company would be required to file individual Form 23C for each product under reference even if the same auditor is appointed for all the products.
5.17 A Company having turnover above Rs. 100 crore undertakes works contracts for pipe line execution for Drinking, Sewerage and Irrigation purpose. The required pipes for the projects, falling under Chapter 68 of CETA, are manufactured by the Company itself. A part of the production is also sold outside. Whether Cost Audit is applicable for Pipe manufacture.
Applicability of cost audit is based on turnover of the total company. Any activity of a company, irrespective of the turnover of the particular activity, would be covered under cost audit if that particular activity is one of the activities listed in the cost audit order Nos. 52/26/CAB-2010 dated 2nd May 2011 or 30th June 2011. Whether the company under reference will attract cost audit for its pipe manufacturing activity will now depend on whether the captive consumption is made for a product which is under cost audit. In this case it is not so and the pipe manufacturing will attract cost audit under this test. However, if the production of pipes is an ancillary activity as defined in MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, then pipe manufacturing would be outside purview of cost audit.
(2) the equity shares to be held by the captive user(s) in the generating station shall not be less than twenty six per cent of the proportionate of the equity of the company related to the generating unit or units identified as the captive generating plant.
5.8 Companies covered under any of the 6 Industry/Product Specific Cost Accounting Records Rules 2011 are also subject to cost audit. Will they be required to file Compliance Report also under these Rules?
(a) (a) If one or more product(s)/activity(s) of a company is covered under cost audit and there are other products that are not covered under Cost Audit as per company-wise cost audit orders issued in the past or industry specific cost audit orders dated 2nd May, 2011 and 30th June, 2011, the Company will be required to file a Compliance Report (Company as a whole) covering products under cost audit and products not under cost audit. (b) If one or more product(s)/activity(s) of a company is covered under Cost Audit and the other product(s)/activity(s) belong to the exempted category, then the company will not be required to file a Compliance Report.
5.9 Are there any sectors exempted under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011?
Please refer MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, which states that the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 are not applicable to wholesale & retail trading, banking, financial, leasing, investment, insurance, education, healthcare, tourism, travel, hospitality, recreation, transport services, business/ professional consultancy, IT & IT enabled services, research & development, postal/courier services, etc. unless any of these have been specifically covered under any other Cost Accounting Records Rules.
5.10 The manufacturing process of a company generates Steel Scrap during production of its main products which may or may not be covered under cost audit. Such scrap is cleared under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff and sold in the market. Will the company be covered under cost audit for generation of scrap?
The company is engaged in manufacture of products and coverage of its main products under cost audit would depend on whether or not such products are covered under company specific cost audit orders issued in the past or industry specific cost audit orders dated 2nd May 2011 or 30th June 2011. The generation of steel scrap is not a production or processing or manufacturing but is incidental to manufacture of its main products. Even though steel scrap, when sold, is liable for payment of excise duty under Chapter 72, still, generation of scrap will not be covered under cost audit.
5.11 A Cost Accountant is in full time employment in a company. He is also holding part time certificate of practice. Whether he can certify the Compliance Report of group companies and/or any other company.
A Cost Accountant and a member of the Institute can certify the Compliance Report of the company where he is a permanent employee. In his capacity as a part-time COP holder, he is neither authorized to certify the Compliance Report of other group companies nor any other company.
5.12 Whether Laminates made from Kraft paper covered under Chapter 48 of Central Excise Tariff Act is covered under Cost Audit?
Since Laminates made from Kraft Paper are paper based products covered under Chapter 48 of Central Excise Tariff Act, the same is covered under Cost Audit as per cost audit order dated 30th June 2011 read with MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011.
5.13 "Paints and Varnishes" under Chapter 32 of Central Excise Tariff are covered under Cost Audit vide order no. F.No.52/26/CAB-2010 dated 30th June, 2011. Paints, Coatings and Printing Ink etc. sold under various trade names are produced by using Varnish as primary raw material to which different Pigments are added in different qualities. These products also belong to Chapter 32 of Central Excise Tariff. Whether such products would be considered as "Allied Products" of Varnish and be covered under cost audit?
As per cost audit order dated 30th June, 2011, Paints & Varnish along with their "Intermediate" and "Articles and Allied Products" thereof are covered under cost audit. In the MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, the terms "Intermediate" and "Articles and Allied Products" have been defined. In view of this clarification, the items produced from Varnish are covered under cost audit irrespective of trade name under which it is sold, provided they meet the criteria laid down in the said circular.
5.14 Para 9 of the Companies (Cost Audit Report) Rules 2011 requires disclosure of “Cost of Production” and “Cost of Sales” at a company level. How the same would be available when all the products/ activities are not covered under cost audit?
The Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011 [CARR] is now applicable to all companies engaged in production, processing, manufacturing & mining. Hence, product-wise/ activity-wise cost of production and cost of sales would be available from the Cost Accounting Records of all the products/ activities, irrespective of whether these are covered under cost audit or not. It may further be noted that in such a situation, the company would also be required to file a compliance report and for this purpose, product-wise/ activity-wise cost of production and cost of sales would be determined to prepare the reconciliation statement as required in the compliance report. 5.15 Whether there is any sequence of filing compliance report and cost audit report for a company which is required to file both?
Compliance report and Cost Audit Report are mutually exclusive to each other and it does not make any difference as to which report is submitted first.
5.16 Whether separate Form 23C is required to be filed by a company having two or more different types of products covered under cost audit?
The company would be required to file individual Form 23C for each product under reference even if the same auditor is appointed for all the products.
5.17 A Company having turnover above Rs. 100 crore undertakes works contracts for pipe line execution for Drinking, Sewerage and Irrigation purpose. The required pipes for the projects, falling under Chapter 68 of CETA, are manufactured by the Company itself. A part of the production is also sold outside. Whether Cost Audit is applicable for Pipe manufacture.
Applicability of cost audit is based on turnover of the total company. Any activity of a company, irrespective of the turnover of the particular activity, would be covered under cost audit if that particular activity is one of the activities listed in the cost audit order Nos. 52/26/CAB-2010 dated 2nd May 2011 or 30th June 2011. Whether the company under reference will attract cost audit for its pipe manufacturing activity will now depend on whether the captive consumption is made for a product which is under cost audit. In this case it is not so and the pipe manufacturing will attract cost audit under this test. However, if the production of pipes is an ancillary activity as defined in MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, then pipe manufacturing would be outside purview of cost audit.
5.18 A company is engaged in
construction of Roads, Bridges, Marine facilities etc. having sites in India
and abroad. The company also has Joint venture projects in India and abroad.
Whether Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011 would be applicable to
the company?
As per MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, if a company is engaged in construction business as a contractor or a sub-contractor, then the company will not be covered under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011. However, construction undertaken by a company on its own, say development of a commercial complex, office blocks, residential flats, roads, bridges and other infra-structural facilities etc. with the ultimate object of either selling the same to customers or permitting their use on chargeable basis (say, Toll Charges for roads/bridges, renting of office complex) would be covered under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011. This would also include above activities under BOT/BOOT mode
As per MCA General Circular No. 67/2011 dated 30th November 2011, if a company is engaged in construction business as a contractor or a sub-contractor, then the company will not be covered under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011. However, construction undertaken by a company on its own, say development of a commercial complex, office blocks, residential flats, roads, bridges and other infra-structural facilities etc. with the ultimate object of either selling the same to customers or permitting their use on chargeable basis (say, Toll Charges for roads/bridges, renting of office complex) would be covered under Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011. This would also include above activities under BOT/BOOT mode
No comments:
Post a Comment