Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Enlistment of agencies authorized to issue Certificate of Origin – Non-Preferential

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 37 (RE 2012)/2009-2014
NEW DELHI, DATED THE 17th DECEMBER, 2012
Subject: – Enlistment of agencies authorized to issue Certificate of Origin – Non-Preferential.
In exercise of powers conferred under paragraph 2.4 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby authorizes the following two agencies to issue Certificate of Origin – Non Preferential:
(i) Centre for Development of Stones (CDOS),
SP-8, Sitapura Industrial Area,
Phase (IV), Jaipur (Rajasthan)- 302022
Tel: + 91-141-5122609 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting + 91-141-5122609 FREE end_of_the_skype_highlighting , 5185054
Fax: + 91-141-5122610
E-mail: info@cdos-india.com
Website: www.cdos-india.com
(ii) All India Chamber of Commerce & Industries,
84/2, South Raja Street,
Tuticorin-628001
Tel: 0461-2324495 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0461-2324495 FREE end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: 0461-2323395
E-mail: aicci82@gmail.com
2. Accordingly, names of the above agencies are added at Serial No. 5 (Rajasthan) and Serial No. 15 (Tamil Nadu) of Appendix 4C (List of Agencies Authorized to issue Certificate of Origin – Non-Preferential) of Handbook of Procedures Vol.I (Appendices & Aayat Niryat Forms), 2009-2014.
3. Effect of this Public Notice:
Two new agencies have been authorized for issuing Certificate of Origin-Non Preferential.

CENVAT Credit & Refund can be availed even without registration

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
CESTAT, CHENNAI BENCH
Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai
v.
Varizon Data Services (I) (P.) Ltd.
STAY ORDER NO. 369 OF 2012
FINAL ORDER NO. 517 OF 2012
ST/S/419/2011 & ST/654/2011
MAY 9, 2012
 
Insofar as requirement of registration with the department as a condition precedent for claiming Cenvat credit is concerned, learned counsel appearing for both parties were unable to point out any provision in the Cenvat Credit Rules which impose such restriction. In the absence of a statutory provision which prescribed that registration is mandatory and that if such a registration is not made the assessee is not entitled to the benefit of refund, the three authorities committed a serious error in rejecting the claim for refund on the ground which is not existence in law. Therefore, said finding recorded by the Tribunal as well as by the lower authorities cannot be sustained. Accordingly, it is set aside. 

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Non-CTS 2010 Standard cheques withdrawal time limit extended to to March 31, 2013

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF

RBI/2012-13/335
DPSS.CO.CHD.No.955/04.07.05/2012-13
December 14, 2012
Standardisation and Enhancement of Security Features in Cheque Forms-Migrating to CTS 2010 standards
A reference is invited to our circular DPSS.CO.CHD.No. 399/04.07.05/2012-13 dated September 3, 2012 advising all banks to arrange to issue only multi-city/payable at par CTS-2010 standard cheques not later than September 30, 2012 and to withdraw the non-CTS-2010 Standard cheques in circulation before December 31, 2012 by creating customer awareness. Further, banks holding post-dated EMI cheques (received either on their own behalf or on behalf of their NBFC clients) were advised to ensure the replacement of non-CTS-2010 Standard cheques with CTS-2010 standard cheques before December 31, 2012.
2. While most of the banks have confirmed that they are issuing only multi-city/payable at par CTS-2010 standard cheques at present, representations have been received from various stakeholders requesting for extension of the time beyond December 31, 2012 for withdrawal / replacement of non-CTS-2010 Standard cheques / post-dated EMI cheques with CTS-2010 standard cheques.
3. Taking into consideration these representations, it has been decided to extend the time up to March 31, 2013 for banks to ensure withdrawal of non-CTS 2010 Standard cheques and replace them with CTS-2010 Standard cheques. However, it may be noted that the residual non-CTS-2010 Standard cheques that get presented in the clearing system beyond this extended period will continue to be accepted for the clearing but will be cleared at less frequent intervals. The modalities, charges applicable if any, etc. are being discussed with stakeholders and a separate communication will follow in this regard.
4. The above instructions are issued under section 18 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act 2007 (Act 51 of 2007).
5. Please acknowledge receipt and ensure withdrawal of non-CTS-2010 Standard cheques within the extended target date indicated above.

Bank should not levy penalty on conversion of one Term deposit in other

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
RBI /2012-13/334
RPCD.RRB.BC.No.52/03.05.33/2012-13
December 14, 2012
All Regional Rural Banks
Dear Sir/Madam
Conversion of Term Deposits, Daily Deposits or Recurring Deposits for Reinvestment in Term Deposits by Regional Rural Banks
As per extant instructions on Interest Rates on Deposits, RRBs on request from the depositor, should allow closure of a term deposit, a deposit in the form of daily deposit or recurring deposit, to enable the depositor to immediately reinvest the amount lying in the aforesaid deposits with the same bank in another term deposit. RRBs are required to pay interest in respect of such term deposit without reducing the interest by way of penalty provided that deposit remains with the bank after reinvestment for a period longer than the remaining period of the original contract.
2. On a review of the extant regulatory norms, and in order to facilitate better Asset Liability Management (ALM), it has been decided to permit banks to formulate their own policies towards conversion of deposits with immediate effect.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

XBRL filing due date extended to 15th January 2013

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
General Circular No: 39/2012 , Dated 12.12.2012
Sub: Filing of Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) mode for the financial year commencing on or after 01.04.2011.
Sir,
In continuation of the Ministry’s General Circular Nos: 16/2012 dated 06.07.2012 and 34/2012 dated 25.10.2012 on the subject cited above, it is stated that the time limit to file the financial statements in the XBRL mode without any additional fee/penalty has been extended up to 15th January 2013 or within 30 days from the date of AGM of the company, whichever is later.
2. All other terms and conditions of the General Circular No: 16/2012 dated 06.07.2012 will remain the same.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Liaison Office (LO) / Branch Office (BO) in India by Foreign Entities – Reporting to Income Tax Authorities

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
RBI/2012-13/311
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 55
November 26, 2012
To
All Authorised Dealers Category – I Banks
Madam / Sir,
Liaison Office (LO) / Branch Office (BO) in India by Foreign Entities – Reporting to Income Tax Authorities.
Attention of Authorised Dealer Category – I banks is invited to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 24 dated 30.12.2009 in terms of which LOs/BOs are required to furnish copy of the Annual Activity Certificate (AAC) to Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Drum Shaped Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi 110002.
2. It is clarified that copies of the AACs submitted to the DGIT (International Taxation) should be accompanied by audited financial statements including receipt and payment account.
3. Further, at the time of renewal of permission of LOs by AD banks, they may note to endorse a copy of each such renewal to the office of the DGIT (international Taxation).
4. AD Category – I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents/customers concerned and ensure compliance.
5. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under Sections 10(4) and 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.

Soon Companies to spend at least 2% of average net profits (of last 3 years) on CSR

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Incorporation of the Corporate Social Responsibility Provision in the New Companies Bill
Clause 135 of the Companies Bill, 2011 inter alia, provides for the specified companies to spend at least 2% of the average net profits (of last 3 years) in pursuance of the company’s Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) policy and in case of failure, to specify the reasons for not spending such amount in the Board’s Report. Giving this information in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today, Shri Sachin Pilot, Minister of Corporate Affairs, said that in case the disclosure about such reasons in the Board’s report is not made, the specified class of companies shall be liable for action under the provisions of the Companies Bill, 2011 which require disclosures to be made in the Board’s report. CSR policy is to be undertaken by the companies as specified in schedule VII of the Companies Bill, 2011.

Can Assessing Officer enforce the payment of Advance Income Tax?

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Section 234B and Section 234C provides for the interest payment, in case non-payment/short payment of advance income tax. But can the Assessing Officer enforce the payment of Advance Income Tax? The answer is given below. [Income Tax "Pravdhan"]
Section 210(3) says “In the case of a person who has been already assessed by way of regular assessment in respect of the total income of any previous year , the Assessing Officer, if he is of opinion that such person is liable to pay advance tax, may, at any time during the financial year but not later than the last day of February, by order in writing, require such person to pay advance tax calculated in the manner laid down in section 209, and issue to such person a notice of demand under section 156 specifying the installment or installments in which such tax is to be paid.”
Section 210(5) says “A person who is served with an order of the Assessing Officer under sub-section (3) or an amended order under sub-section (4) may, if in his estimation the advance tax payable on his current income would be less than the amount of the advance tax specified in such order or amended order, send an intimation in the prescribed form [Form No. 28A] to the Assessing Officer to that effect and pay such advance tax as accords with his estimate, calculated in the manner laid down in section 209, at the appropriate percentage thereof specified in section 211, on or before the due date or each of the due dates specified in section 211 falling after the date of such intimation.”
Estimate made by assessee [Form No. 28A] can not be rejected by department as was held in case of Punjab Tractors Ltd. v. CIT [2004] 137 Taxman 211 (Punj. & Har.).

No s. 40(a)(ia) Disallowance For Short-Deduction TDS Default

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax ]
ITAT No. 183 of 2012 GA No. 2069 of 2012
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XI
Versus
M/S. S.K. TEKRIWAL
Date : 3rd December, 2012
 
Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act refers only to the duty to deduct tax and pay to government account. If there is any shortfall due to any difference of opinion as to the taxability of any item or the nature of payments falling under various TDS provisions, the assessee can be declared to be an assessee in default u/s. 201 of the Act and no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.

Monday, December 3, 2012

GAAR to be effective from Assessment year 2014-15

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
General Anti-Avoidance Rules The GAAR (General Anti-Avoidance Rule) provisions have not been put on hold. The Finance Act, 2012 had provided that these provisions shall be effective from the 1st day of April, 2014 and apply to Assessment year 2014-15 onwards.
One of the recommendations of the Parthasarathi Shome Committee is that GAAR should be deferred for 3 years. The Committee has cited the following reasons for suggesting this deferral:
‘The implementation of GAAR may be deferred by three years on administrative grounds. GAAR is an extremely advanced instrument of tax administration – one of deterrence, rather than for revenue generation – for which intensive training of tax officers, who would specialize in the finer aspects of international taxation, is needed’.
This was stated by the Minister of Finance, Shri S.S.Planimanickam in a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today.

Foreign Companies/Firms having issues in registration on Income Tax Website – FAQ

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Q: The Principal Contact is a Foreigner/Non-resident and does not have a PAN and hence, not able to register in the new e-Filing Application. What should be done?
A: As per CBDT guidelines, Foreigners without PAN is allowed to be an authorized signatory and can file on behalf of the Company/Firm without a PAN encrypted DSC. The assessee Company is required to send an email to efilinghelpdesk@incometaxindia.gov.in mentioning details such as Name of the Company, PAN of the Company, Date of Incorporation, Name of the Principal Contact and DOB of the Principal Contact.
Q: While updating the Principal Contact details in the Profile, PAN field is not available. What to do?
A: The possible reason can be that the previous Principal Contact was a Foreigner without a PAN and might have been added as an exception case in the e-Filing application. To remove this exception, send an email to efilinghelpdesk@incometaxindia.gov.in mentioning details such as Name of the Company, PAN of the Company, Date of Incorporation, Name of the Principal Contact, PAN of the Principal Contact and DOB of the Principal Contact. The exempted details in the e-Filing application will be deleted and the Principal Contact will be able to register the PAN of the new Principal Contact.
Q:The Principal Contact of my Company/Firm is a foreigner and does not have a PAN. The Principal Contact has been updated without PAN in the Company/Firm profile of the e-Filing portal. The Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) of the Principal Contact is with a dummy PAN. When I try to upload/register the DSC, PAN mismatch error comes up. What to do?
A: Digital Signature Certificate with dummy PAN will not be accepted by the e-Filing application. In case the Principal Contact has been updated without PAN, Digital Signature Certificate without PAN encryption should be used. In case the Principal Contact is updated in the profile with a PAN, Digital Signature Certificate with the same PAN should be used.
Q: In case of our Company/Firm, the Principal Contact is a foreigner/non-resident without a PAN, how should the XML of the ITR be generated, because of verification in the return requires for a PAN field to be filled up?
A: For filling up the verification field, you may use dummy PAN (FFFPF9999F). It is again clarified, that the dummy PAN can be used only for the verification field and DSC with dummy PAN will not be accepted.
In case of a Foreign Company, if the authorized signatory is a non-resident foreigner, an e-mail may be sent to efilinghelpdesk@incometaxindia.gov.in with a subject “Non-resident Foreign Director (NRFD) update”.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

EPFO launches e-Passbook service

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Over 50 million PF subscribers can now access their accounts online as retirement fund body EPFO launched its e-Passbook service today. Active subscribers whose electronic challan-cum-return is already uploaded, can download their e-Passbook every month under the service launched by the EPFO’s Central Provident Fund Commissioner R C Mishra today.
The facility shall be available on www.Epfindia.Gov.In.
In the case of members who are not active (left service) and have not settled their account or have not become inoperative, the facility to download the passbook on request basis shall be available, EPFO said.
Any member of Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) can register on the member portal by using his or her photo identification number, such as PAN, Aadhaar, National Population Registry, driving licence, passport, voter ID, ration card and use the mobile number as password.
Members can add multiple ID (identification) numbers after registration and can use any one for logging into their account. Once registered, a member can download the passbook by entering his or her account number. If available, the passbook will appear for download.
The e-Passbook shall contain the transaction-wise details of the member’s account (all credits and debits) since the month for which the details for the establishment have been processed in new application software at the field offices.
The facility, however, will not be available for members under exempted establishments under the EPF Scheme 1952 (as the fund details are maintained by the Trust) and inoperative members (i.e. in accounts where no contribution has been received in the preceding 36 months).
Under the e-Passbook service, only one registration will be allowed against one mobile number, and a member can download the passbook for only one account number under one establishment.
A senior EPFO official told that the exempted PF trust regulated by the body would also be asked to provide this service to their members.

New Valuation methods of unquoted shares u/s. 56

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF

For section 56, value of unquoted shares can optionally be taken as value determined by either DFCF or as per revised method

Income-tax (Fifteenth Amendment) Rules, 2012 – Amendment in Rules 11U and 11UA

Notification No. 52/2012 [F.No. 142/19/2012-SO (TPL)]/SO 2805(E), dated 29-11-2012

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2012.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), in rule 11U,—

(A) for clauses (a) and (b), the following clauses shall respectively be substituted, namely:-

‘(a) “accountant” ,-

(i) for the purposes of sub-rule (2) of rule 11UA, means a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India within the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949) who is not appointed by the company as an auditor under Section 44AB of the Act or under Section 224 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); and

(ii) in any other case, shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in the Explanation below sub-section (2) of section 288 of the Act;

(b)“balance-sheet”, in relation to any company, means,-

(i) for the purposes of sub-rule (2) of rule 11 UA, the balance-sheet of such company (including the notes annexed thereto and forming part of the accounts) as drawn up on the valuation date which has been audited by the auditor of the company appointed under section 224 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and where the balance-sheet on the valuation date is not drawn up, the balance-sheet (including the notes annexed thereto and forming part of the accounts) drawn up as on a date immediately preceding the valuation date which has been approved and adopted in the annual general meeting of the shareholders of the company; and

(ii) in any other case, the balance-sheet of such company (including the notes annexed thereto and forming part of the accounts) as drawn up on the valuation date which has been audited by the auditor appointed under section 224 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);’;

(B) for clause (j), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-

‘(j) “valuation date” means the date on which the property or consideration, as the case may be, is received by the assessee.’.

3. The rule 11UA of the said rules shall be renumbered as sub-rule (1) thereof, -

(i) in sub-rule (1) as so renumbered, in clause (c), for sub-clause (b), the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“(b) the fair market value of unquoted equity shares shall be the value, on the valuation date, of such unquoted equity shares as determined in the following manner, namely:—

the fair market value of unquoted equity shares =
(A-L)
×
(PV),
(PE)

where,

A = book value of the assets in the balance-sheet as reduced by any amount of tax paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund under the Income-tax Act and any amount shown in the balance-sheet as asset including the unamortised amount of deferred expenditure which does not represent the value of any asset;

L = book value of liabilities shown in the balance-sheet, but not including the following amounts, namely:—

(i) the paid-up capital in respect of equity shares;

(ii) the amount set apart for payment of dividends on preference shares and equity shares where such dividends have not been declared before the date of transfer at a general body meeting of the company;

(iii) reserves and surplus, by whatever name called, even if the resulting figure is negative, other than those set apart towards depreciation;

(iv) any amount representing provision for taxation, other than amount of tax paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund under the Income-tax Act, to the extent of the excess over the tax payable with reference to the book profits in accordance with the law applicable thereto;

(v) any amount representing provisions made for meeting liabilities, other than ascertained liabilities;

(vi) any amount representing contingent liabilities other than arrears of dividends payable in respect of cumulative preference shares;

PE = total amount of paid up equity share capital as shown in the balance-sheet;

PV = the paid up value of such equity shares;”;

(ii) after the sub-rule (1) as so renumbered, the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-

“(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-clause (b) of clause (c) of sub-rule (1), the fair market value of unquoted equity shares for the purposes of sub-clause (/) of clause (a) of Explanation to clause (viib) of sub-section (2) of section 56 shall be the value, on the valuation date, of such unquoted equity shares as determined in the following manner under clause (a) or clause (b), at the option of the assessee, namely:—

(a) the fair market value of unquoted equity shares =
(A-L)
×
(PV),
(PE)

where,

A = book value of the assets in the balance-sheet as reduced by any amount of tax paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund under the Income-tax Act and any amount shown in the balance-sheet as asset including the unamortised amount of deferred expenditure which does not represent the value of any asset;

L = book value of liabilities shown in the balance-sheet, but not including the following amounts, namely:—

(i) the paid-up capital in respect of equity shares;

(ii) the amount set apart for payment of dividends on preference shares and equity shares where such dividends have not been declared before the date of transfer at a general body meeting of the company;

(iii) reserves and surplus, by whatever name called, even if the resulting figure is negative, other than those set apart towards depreciation;

(iv) any amount representing provision for taxation, other than amount of tax paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund as refund under the Income-tax Act, to the extent of the excess over the tax payable with reference to the book profits in accordance with the law applicable thereto;

(v) any amount representing provisions made for meeting liabilities, other than ascertained liabilities;

(vi) any amount representing contingent liabilities other than arrears of dividends payable in respect of cumulative preference shares;

PE = total amount of paid up equity share capital as shown in the balance-sheet;

PV = the paid up value of such equity shares; or

(b) the fair market value of the unquoted equity shares determined by a merchant banker or an accountant as per the Discounted Free Cash Flow method.”.

 

Registration of CAs in New e-filing Website

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Registration of CAs in the New e-filing Website: I am happy to inform you that a long-awaited initiative to curb the misuse of membership numbers of our members in the tax audit reports has finally been taken. The new e-filing system launched by the CBDT (Central Board of Direct Taxes) has opened a window for chartered accountants to register and upload certain specified reports required to be furnished by chartered accountants including tax audit report. Time and again, ICAI has pursued the issue of misuse of membership numbers being followed at various levels. The same has been well appreciated by the Department, which now requires the Chartered accountants to directly upload their reports with their digital signatures in the e–filing website. The assessee is, however, required to mention the details of the chartered accountant while filing his return. ICAI would also be validating the data of practicing members for the purpose of registration and thereafter at the time of filing of report. This will ensure that no fake audits are being reported to the Department. Grievances, if any, with regard to registration in new e-filing system may also be sent to us so that the system can be improved further.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

How to track Income tax Refund online

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
The Income Tax Department entertains queries for all assessees regarding the refunding of income tax through the Tax Information Network (TIN). The SBI has been appointed as the refund banker, which processes refunds and routes them to the assessees’ bank accounts. If the assessee does not choose direct credit, a cheque is sent. This facility also helps track the status of the parcel that has been despatched by speed post. All refunds are handled by the Central Processing Centre (CPC) at Bangalore. Visit https://tin.tin.nsdl.com/oltas/refundstatuslogin.html for checking the status of your income tax refund. You can do so by indicating your PAN, relevant assessment year and then clicking on ‘submit’.
Processing
If the processing of the refund has not been completed by your assessing officer, or if there is no refund payable to you for that year, you will get a message saying so.
Refund details
If there is a refund, you will get details showing your refund reference number, the date of credit to your bank account or the date of despatch of the cheque by speed post, and the speed post reference number, if applicable
Tracking
You can go to http://services.ptcmysore.gov.in/speednettracking/ and enter the speed post reference number. On submitting it, you will get a link called ‘movement’, which will show the status of your parcel.
E-mail
You can submit your reference number and e-mail ID on the speed post tracker screen. You will receive an e-mail when your parcel has been received.
Points to note
Status check: You can check if your refund has been sent to the SBI, the refund banker, by logging into your e-filing account.
Payment mode: Refunds are being sent in following two modes:
  1. RTGS / NECS: To enable credit of refund directly to the bank account, Taxpayer’s Bank A/c (at least 10 digits), MICR code of bank branch and correct communication address is mandatory.
  2. Paper Cheque: Bank Account No, Correct address is mandatory.
Error notification: If there is an error in the refund or in case of any other query, the assessee can write to CPC Bangalore, quoting the refund reference number.

Online Tracking Facility to Check Corruption in Income Tax Refunds

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Web Based Status Tracking Facility Launched to Check Corruption in Income Tax Refunds
Instances of alleged corruption for settlement of refund claims and complaints come to notice from time to time. Whenever any such instance or complaints comes to notice, the same is verified and if it is found to be correct, the concerned officers/officials have to face penal consequences depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.
The process of issue of refunds has been streamlined in the course of computerization and encouraging e-filing of returns for speedy processing and issue of refunds through refund banker scheme. A web based status tracking facility for refunds has also been launched. The grievance redressal mechanism has been strengthened for ensuring prompt disposal of all such complaints.
Significant success has been achieved. An e-filed return claiming refund is now on an average processed within three to four months of its filing.
This was stated by the Minister of State for Finance, Shri S.S. Palanimanickam in a written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha today.

Cenvat credit can be taken on machine procured prior to registration

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH
Global Digital Color Lab
v.
Commissioner of Central Excise I, Jaipur-I
FINAL ORDER NOS. 827-828/2012-SM(BR)
APPEAL NOS. ST/1265-1266 OF 2011-SM
JUNE 20, 2012
 
Ld. A.R has not been able to point out any provisions to the effect that Cenvat credit cannot be taken on machine procured prior to the date of issue of registration certificate. The argument of the lower authorities seems to be that the credit entries in the register for taking credit should not have been earlier than the date of granting of registration. There is nothing in the rules prohibiting a person from maintaining proper account. There is no statutory record presently prescribed like “RG-23″ as was earlier in force. The business records maintained correctly reflecting the position has to be accepted. I do not find any merit in the argument adopted by the lower authorities. Therefore, I set aside the impugned orders of lower authorities in both the appeals and allow the appeals.

Services provided by one unit of assessee to other unit not liable to service tax if Registration of Units based on same PAN

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
CESTAT, KOLKATA BENCH
SAIL
v.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ranchi
ORDER NO. M-268/KOL of 2012/5-545/KOL of 2012
MA – 168 of 2012 & SP – 311 of 2010
APPEAL NO. st/115 of 2010
JUNE 18, 2012
 
 We find from the Central Excise Registration and the other documents furnished by the applicant that the Registration by Central Excise Department has been given by including PAN Number of SAIL. There is no dispute that the applicant is an unit of M/s SAIL and the other units are also part of M/s SAIL. Thus, we find that the service is being provided to self, this Tribunal in the case of Precot Mills (supra) and also in the case of Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. (supra), held that the service provided to self is not liable to service tax. In these circumstances, we find that the applicants are able to make out a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit in their favour. Therefore, the requirement of pre-deposit of all dues adjudged is waived and recovery of the same is stayed during pendency of the appeal. Stay petition is allowed. Miscellaneous application is disposed of.

Providing adequate support staff to all assessment units – CBDT

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Letter [F. No. HRD/CMD/123/2/2011-12/2301], Dated 23-11-2012
Assessment officers of many charges have conveyed to the Board that they are not being provided any secretarial assistance or other office help and they are left with no option but to make private arrangement to finalise their assessment orders and other time bound matters.
2. Chairperson, CBDT has viewed this matter very seriously. While it is true that the Department is presently facing shortages of manpower, however, the current situation where assessing officers are forced to make private arrangements for secretarial assistance and other help to run their office is highly undesirable and cannot be allowed to continue without seriously compromising the functioning of the Department.
3. In this regard, the undersigned is directed to draw your kind attention to the Rule 178 of GFR 2005 which allows outsourcing of certain services in the Interest of economy and efficiency. It is also noted that every Commissionerate has already been sanctioned a budget of Rs. 30 lacs for meeting expenses of this nature. You are accordingly requested to ensure that these funds are properly utilised and every assessing officer in all the Commissionerates under your charge is provided with adequate secretarial assistance and other office help either through the regular employees of the department or through outsourcing. In case, further funds are needed in this regard, requisition should immediately be sent to the DIT (Expenditure Budget) under DG (Logistics). All action In this regard may be completed by the end of this month.
4. In order to assess the prevailing shortage of manpower in your respective charge, following information is required: -
1.The total number of assessing officers presently in position In your charge
2The number of (a) Secretarial assistants; (b) DEOs; (c) MTS provided to each of the assessing officers
3.The total number of (a) Secretarial assistants; (b) DEOs; (c) MTS hired through outsourcing
4.The total number of PS, Steno Gr. I, Steno Gr. II, STA, TA and MTS in position
5. The aforesaid information covering all the Commissionerates in the CCA region should be sent in the following format to the undersigned, with a copy sent by e-mail as well at cmd.hrd.cbdt@incometaxindia.gov.in positively by November 30, 2012:
Grade
Number in position
Number of Stenos
Number of DEOs
Number of MTS
Regular employees
Through outsourcing
Regular employees
Through outsourcing
Regular employees
Through outsourcing
DCIT
ACIT
ITO
TOTAL
This issues with the approval of the Chairperson, CBDT and may be treated as most urgent.

Commission paid to overseas agents for export sales is an input service

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
CESTAT, New Delhi Bench
Ajay Industries
v.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jalandhar
Final Order Nos. ST/A/487-491 of 2012-Cus.
Appeal Nos. ST/741-745 of 2008
June 8, 2012
 
 Overseas commission agent services promotes the assessee’s business activities and adds to Revenue earning by manufacture and sale of incremental quantity, activity may have nexus to such sales and Service Tax paid on such services has to be held as includable in the definition of inputs services.

No Penalty on voluntary admission of Assessee of taxing the income @ 8%

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Pronounced on : 11.10.2012
ITA 1246/2010
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX –VI
Versus
VATIKA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
 
In the present case, the assessee’s cash payments were concededly not the amount which was disallowed; they had no co-relation to what could not be established, and were disallowable. Further, the judicial record would show that when the AO decided to initiate penalty proceeding, he had no material to conclude that the assessee had concealed income or provided inaccurate particulars. The assessee did provide particulars, but could not back up its claim with confirmation; its explanation was that the payees insisted on immediate payment, to fulfill their contractual commitment to their suppliers. The payees were small vendors, willing to ensure supply of materials to the assessee’s site. Clearly, a case for business expediency had been urged. Most importantly, the material which led to the penalty order –i.e. absence of the payees at their places or address provided, was gathered after notice under Section 271 (1) (c) was issued. The assessee complained of this procedure, calling it unfair, as it ought to have been provided with opportunity in this regard during the assessment and that material which did not exist at time of initiation of the penalty proceeding ought not to have been put against it. This Court is of opinion that the objection is well-founded, because the AO did not have the benefit of such material, and therefore could not have, only on the basis of the assessee’s offer to be taxed at 8% on gross receipts, have concluded that it had provided inaccurate particulars in its returns. Moreover, the course of action suggested by the AO was in fact accepted by the assessee, as reasonable. In these circumstances, the imposition of penalty was not justified. The court therefore, is of opinion that there is no infirmity in the impugned order of the Tribunal. The question of law is therefore answered against the revenue, and in favour of the assessee; the appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Monday, October 22, 2012

Section 32(1) not applicable If assessee is only permitted to use trade mark /brand name of foreign collaborator with certain conditions

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
IN THE ITAT CHENNAI BENCH ‘B’
Fenner (India) Ltd.
v.
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax
IT APPEAL NOS. 722 & 1047 (MDS.) OF 2009
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06]
APRIL 23, 2012
 
With regard to the contention of the revenue that the assessee has acquired intangible asset and therefore depreciation is allowable under section 32(1); it is opined that the provisions of section 32(1) are applicable when the assessee acquires on or after 1-4-1998 and owns wholly or partly any know-how, patents, copy rights, trade mark, etc. and uses the same for the purpose of business or profession. In this case, the assessee has not either owned wholly or partly any know-how, patents, copy rights, trade mark, etc. so as to apply the provisions of section 32(1). The assessee is only permitted to use trade mark and brand name of the foreign collaborator with certain conditions. Therefore, the provisions of section 32(1) are not applicable to the facts of the assessee’s case. 

No Capital gain tax firm if it doesn’t distribute any capital asset to retiring partners

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH ‘F’
Income-tax Officer – 25(3)(4)
v.
Fine Developers
IT APPEAL NO. 4630 (MUM.) OF 2011
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09]
OCTOBER 12, 2012
 
Allocation of assets of the firm to the retiring partners is the basis for invocation of provisions of Section 45(4). In the case under consideration, neither there was any dissolution nor other event took place that had an effect of allocation of exclusive interest in any capital asset to the retiring partners. In these circumstances, FAA was justified in holding that conditions of Section 45(4) were not fulfilled. In our opinion the firm or the continuing partners were not liable to be taxed under the head ‘capital gains’, as held by the FAA. Retiring partners had relinquished their rights in the assets of the firm and in lieu of that firm had paid the retiring partners money lying in their capital account. Obviously, assessee-firm had not transferred any right in capital asset to the retiring partners rather it is the retiring partners who have transferred the rights in capital assets in favour of the continuing partners. So, even if capital gain has to be taxed it has to be in the hands of the retiring partners not in the case of the assessee-firm.

Carry forward business losses & depreciation cannot be set off against profits of an undertaking while working out claim u/s. 10B

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH ‘A’
ASB International (P.) Ltd.
v.
Deputy Commissioner of Income tax, Circle-1
IT Appeal Nos. 245, 7040 to 7042 (Mum.) of 2011
[Assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08]
JUNE 29, 2012

Since the provisions of section 10A and 10B are similar in nature and as the jurisdictional High Court decided the issue while considering the provisions of section 10B also respectfully following the above, we uphold the contention of assessee that carry forward business losses and depreciation cannot be set off to the profits of the undertaking while working the claim u/s 10B. Therefore, AO is directed to do the needful in light of the above principles laid down.

Friday, October 19, 2012

Splitting of cash payment to circumvent the provisions of law attracts Section 40A(3)

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
IN THE ITAT JODHPUR BENCH
Vaishali Builders & Colonizers
v.
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax,
IT APPEAL NO. 391 (JODH.) OF 2011
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09]
JULY 25, 2012
 
The assessee did not produce sale deed or the agreement during the course of arguments to prove that part cash payments were made in instalments for purchase of land. If it was advance money given to the villagers for purchase of land in instalment, there was no necessity to make payment in cash in instalment. It could be paid by cheques/drafts. Further if the amount was paid at the time of execution of sale deed, the villager/seller would not accept cash payments in instalments everyday during the whole year after the execution of sale deed. Therefore, it is clear that the books of account of the assessee have been manipulated to circumvent the provisions of law. The assessee has, thus, failed to prove genuine payments in instalments to the villagers in cash. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Durga Prasad More [1971] 82 ITR 540 and in the case of Sumati Dayal v. CIT[1995] 214 ITR 801 held that “the Courts and Tribunals have to judge the evidences before them by applying the test of human probabilities after considering the surrounding circumstances.”
Regarding the business expediency, the assessee has not filed any evidence before the authorities below and nothing is clarified as to what were the other relevant factors, for which the cash payment has been made and no specific Rule has been explained u/r 6DD, which is applicable to the case of the assessee. The ld. counsel for the assessee argued that for purchase of agricultural land and payment made to the villagers, the provisions of section 40A(3) may not be applied as provided in exception to Rule 6DD. We have gone through the Rule 6DD applicable now and prior to amendment also, in which none of the exception has been provided for making payment in cash for purchase of land. It is, however, provided that above rule can be avoided if payment is made for purchase of agricultural produce which is not the case of the assessee at all. The assessee is dealing in real estate and in land and as such, it was for the assessee to establish that the cash payments have been made for business exigencies, which the assessee has failed to prove in this case. Further Rule 6DD(j) would not apply in this case because the assessee failed to prove that on the date of payment whether banks were closed either on account of holiday or strike. The ld. CIT(A), therefore, rightly noted in his finding that the assessee has not satisfied as to under which Rule, the assessee’s case would fall. In the case of Trivedi Corporation Pvt. Ltd. (supra), ITAT Ahmedabad Bench considered the issue of disallowance u/s. 40A(3) in respect of cash payment made to Gujrat State Electricity Board, which was considered as one of the undertaking of the State Government. Therefore, it was considered to be a payment made to Government Body and was falling in exception. The case law cited by the ld. counsel for assessee would not support the case of the assessee because they are based on their own facts and that the theory of real income would not apply for dealing with the issue of section 40A(3) of the IT Act. Considering the facts and circumstances and above discussion, it is very clear that the assessee consciously split up the payments in whole of the year, which is impracticable, illogical as noted above and it was done just to circumvent the provisions of law. There was no justification for the assessee to split up the transactions of crores of rupees in small payments of Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 20,000/- everyday. Whatever plea was taken before the authorities below was not supported by any evidence. Therefore, the assessee failed to prove any business expediency or other facts for making staggered payments in cash. The case of the assessee would not fall in any exception to Rule. The assessee deliberately and consciously split up the payments in part so as to circumvent the provisions of law. We, therefore, do not find any justification to interfere with the orders of the authorities below. There is no merit in these grounds of appeal by the assessee. Same are accordingly dismissed.

To revise claim made in Original Return filing of revised return is must

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
IN THE ITAT CHENNAI BENCH ‘C’
Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation)
v.
Litostroj
IT APPEAL NOs. 1241, 1429 & 2132 TO 2135 (mad.) of 2010
[ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05, 2006-07 & 2007-08]
MARCH 30, 2012
 
 Assessees had filed revised computation during the course of assessment proceedings, applying Section 44BBB for computing their respective income, whereas initially they had returned their income based on the audited books of accounts. Application of Section 44BBB of the Act for computing the income was first made through such revised computation. Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Shriram Investments (TCA 344 of 2005 dated 16.6.2012) relying on the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT [2006] 284 ITR 323 has clearly held that for making a claim other than what was originally made in return of income, filing of a revised return is mandatory. Neither the A.O. nor the CIT(Appeals) have considered these fundamental aspects regarding status and validity of a claim made other than through revised return. Further, assessees had also not placed before A.O. various details regarding erection charges received and break-up of the work done by them to M/s TNEB for verifying whether their billings included any fee for technic service. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the matter requires a re-visit by the A.O. for considering the issues de novo. We, therefore, set aside the orders of authorities below and remit it back to the file of the A.O. for consideration afresh in accordance with law.

Service tax paid on maintenance of garden eligible for input service credit

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
CESTAT, BANGALORE BENCH
BASF India Ltd.
v.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mangalore
FINAL ORDER NO. 70 of 2012
APPEAL NO. ST/560 of 2008
FEBRUARY 3, 2012
 
Landscaping of factory or garden certainly would fall within the concept of modernization, renovation, repair, etc. of the office premises. At any rate, the credit rating of an industry is depended upon how the factory is maintained inside and outside the premises. The Environmental law expects the employer to keep the factory without contravening any of those laws. That apart, now the concept of corporate social responsibility is also relevant. It is to discharge a statutory obligation, when the employer spends money to maintain their factory premises in an eco-friendly, manner, certainly, the tax paid on such services would form part of the costs of the final products. In those circumstances, the Tribunal was right in holding that the service tax paid in all these cases would fall within the input services and the assessee is entitled to the benefit thereof.

Tribunal cannot consider validity of retrospective amendment

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M. Abdul Rehuman Kunju
v.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-I, Kollam
I T Appeal Nos. 50 & 63 of 2012
August 3, 2012
 
The validity of a provision cannot be considered or adjudicated upon by the Tribunal constituted under the Act. Section 260A provides for an appeal from every order passed by the Appellate Tribunal. If it involves a substantial question of law, such question of law should arise from the order of the Tribunal. If the Tribunal cannot consider the validity of a retrospective amendment, no doubt such question does not arise from its order and the jurisdiction conferred on the High Court under section 260A cannot also enable the High Court to consider such validity or otherwise.

Interest on bad & doubtful debts kept in reserve account eligible for deduction u/s. 43D

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH ‘L’
American Express Bank Ltd.
v.
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax
IT APPEAL NO. 5374 (MUM.) OF 2001
INT. T.A. NO. 97 (MUM.) OF 2001
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99]
AUGUST 10, 2012
 
Mere crediting of the interest to a reserve cannot be said to be an incidence by which the said interest could be charged to tax. Whatever has been recovered by the assessee has been shown as income. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to claim of such interest under the provisions of section 43D and the claim of the assessee cannot be rejected simply on the ground that interest had been credited on such type of debts in the reserve account. However, for the verification of the figures, the Assessing Officer is directed to see that what has actually received by the assessee during the year has been offered to tax. Thus, the matter is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for such verification. This ground of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in the manner aforesaid.
The inclusion of aforesaid amount of interest in the taxable interest was challenged by the assessee on the basis of proviso to section 5 of the Interest-tax Act read with section 43D according to which interest on such non-performing assets was to be charged to interest tax only in the year in which the said interest is credited to the profit and loss account or in the year of receipt, which is earlier. It is already noted that section 43D is applicable to the case of the assessee and interest can only be charged to the extent it is actually received during the year.
It has already been mentioned that interest on non-performing assets as described in section 43D can be assessed only in a condition that either they are credited to profit and loss account or it is actually received. In the present case of the assessee since interest is not credited on such assets to the profit and loss account, therefore, whatever interest is actually received on such assets is taxable. The same principle will be applicable to interest tax also.

Due date to FILE XBRL Statement for FY 2011-12

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide Notification Number GSR 748 (E) dated 05.10.2011 had mandated filing of financial statements of select class of companies with Registrar of Companies using extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL).
Vide Ministry’s General Circular No. 16/2012 dated 06.07.2012, select class of companies having their financial year commencing on or after 01.04.2011 have been mandated to file their financial statements (based upon new Schedule VI) for Financial Year 2011 -12 using extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL). The applicable Taxonomy, Business Rules and Validation Tool have been finalized and are available on the MCA XBRL website (http://www.mca.qov.in/XBRL/) The XBRL filings of financial statements (based upon new Schedule VI) for F.Y. 2011-12 on MCA website is enabled with effect from 14th October, 2012.
Kindly note that all eligible companies may file their financial statements (based upon new Schedule VI) in XBRL till 15th November, 2012 or within 30 days from date of its AGM, whichever is later, without any additional fees. For further details, visit MCA website www.mca.gov.in

Trust deed is to be treated as settlement deed & would be chargeable to stamp duty

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
P.N. George Wilson v. State
W.A. NO. 1197 OF 2012
M.P. NO. 1 OF 2012
JULY 17, 2012
 
It is to be noted that a settlement is an admixture of gift or partition or trust. In law, a family arrangement/settlement is accepted as a transfer of interest in the property in favour of an individual between whom the family arrangement or settlement is so made. Just because a deed/instrument answers the description of a ‘Trust Deed’, it does not cease to be a ‘settlement’ for the purpose of stamp duty, if it answers the description of ‘settlement’ also. As a matter of fact, a deed of trust/trust deed can also be a settlement deed.
In the present case, the Chief Controlling Authority, Inspector General of Registration, passed an order on 31-5-2008 among other things observing that as per the deed the property is transferred to the trust and held that the deed is settlement outside the family and hence stamp duty leviable as per section 58(a)(ii) and dismissed the revision upholding the orders of the District Registrar.
Looking at from any point of view, on an over all assessment of the facts and circumstances of the present case in a cumulative fashion, it is concluded and held that the trust deed dated 14-7-2003 in issue is chargeable to stamp duty as per article 58 (ii) of the 1899 Act treating it as a settlement deed as per section 2(24) of the 1899 Act.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Levy of Service Tax on Transportation of Goods by Rail from 1st October 2012

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
In compliance of the provisions contained in Finance Bill 2010 and subsequent notifications issued by Ministry of Finance, the Service Tax in case of transportation of goods by rail, which was exempted upto 30th September 2012, would now be levied on total freight charges with effect from 1st October 2012.
Since an abatement of 70% has been permitted on freight for the taxable commodities by the Ministry of Finance, the Service Tax will be charged on 30% of the total chargeable freight inclusive of all charges (like busy season charges, development charge etc.,) would be calculated as follows:-
(i) Service Tax of 12% will be charged on 30% of freight (equivalent to 3.6% on the total freight charges)
(ii) Education Cess of 2% on Service Tax will be added (equivalent to 0.072% on total freight) and
(iii) Higher Education Cess of 1% on Service Tax will also be added (equivalent to 0.036% on total freight)
(iv) Total Service Tax implication will be (i)+(ii)+(iii)=3.708% on the total freight charges.
Certain commodities have been exempted from payment of service tax as per Ministry of Finance notification. The list of such commodities and further details on the modalities of levy and collection of Service Tax on transportation of goods by rail, may be ascertained from Indian Railways’ web site i.e. www.indianrailways.gov.in
The amount of Service Tax collected by Railways would be deposited with the Ministry of Finance as per prescribed procedure.

New Nature of Payments have been introduced under OLTAS Challan No./ITNS 281

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
4 New Categories of payment been added to the existing list of 32 categories. Revised List is follows :-
193 – Interest on Securities
194 – Dividend
195 – Other sums payable to a non-resident
4BB – Winning from Horse race
4EE – Payments in respect of Deposits under National Saving Schemes
4LB – Income by way of interest from infrastructure debt fund payable to a non-resident
4LC – Income by way of interest from specified company payable to a non-resident
6CA – Alcoholic liquor for human consumption
6CB – Timber obtained under forest lease
6CC – Timber obtained other than forest lease
6CD – Any other forest produce not being timber or tendu leaves
6CE – Scrap
6CF – Parking Lot
6CG – Toll Plaza
6CH – Mining and Quarrying
6CI – Tendu Leaves
6CJ – Minerals
6CK – Bullion and Jewellery
92A – Payment to Govt. Employees other than Union Govt. employees
92B – Payment of Employees other than Govt. Employees
94A – Interest other than Interest on Securities
94B – Winning from lotteries and crossword puzzles
94C – Payment of contractors and sub-contractors
94D – Insurance commission
94E – Payments to non-resident Sportsmen/Sport Associations
94F – Payments on account of Re-purchase of Units by Mutual Funds of UTI
94G – Commission, prize etc. on sale of Lottery tickets
94H – Commission or Brokerage
94I – Rent
94J – Fees for Professional or Technical Services
94K – Income Payable to a resident assesse in respect of units of a specified Mutual Fund or of the Units of the UTI
94L – Payment of Compensation on Acquisition of Certain Immovable property
96A – Income in respect of Units of non-residents
96B – Payments in respect of Units to an Offshore Fund
96C – Income from foreign currency Bonds or Shares of Indian Company payable to a non-resident
96D – Income of Foreign Institutional investors from securities

Employees’ contribution towards PF paid before Due Date of Return Filing is allowable

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI
ITA No.1020/Del /2012 – Assessment Year: 2008-09
ACIT V/s. M/s Vipul Facility Management Pvt. Ltd.
Date of Pronouncement: 06-09-2012
 
Employees’ contribution towards PF paid by the assessee before the due date of filing of return u/s 139(1) of the Act for the assessment year under consideration is admissible.

Due Date Extended for Annual Return Filing (Non XBRL) with ROC to 03/11/12 & 22/ 11/12

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
General Circular No.30/2012, Dated: – 28th September, 2012
Sub: Filling of Balance Sheet and profit and loss Account by companies in Non-XBRL for the accounting year commencing on or after 01.04.2011.
The Ministry has issued general circulars No. 21/2012 dated 28/09/12 and No. 28/2012 dated 03/09/12 extending time for filing e-form 23AC (Non-XBRL) and 23ACA (Non-XBRL) up to 15/10/12 or within 30 days from the date of AGM whichever is later. The revise e-forms 23AC (Non-XBRL) and 23ACA (Non-XBRL) have now been notified vide notification dated 24/09/12 and shall come into effect from 30/09/12.
In order to ensure smooth filing and to avoid last minute rush, it is to inform you that with the approval of the competent authority, the due date of filing of e-forms 23AC (Non-XBRL) or 23ACA (Non-XBRL) as per new schedule VI is now further extended in following manner without any additional fees:-
(a) Company holding AGM or whose due date for holding AGM is on or before 20/09/12, the time limit will be 03/11/12 or due date of filing, whichever is later.
(b) Company holding AGM or whose due date for holding AGM is on or after 21/09 /12, the time limit will be 22/ 11/ 12 or due date of filing, whichever is later.

ST return to be filed by 25-10-2012 shall be for the period from 1-4-2012 to 30-6-2012

Print Friendly and PDFPrintPrint Friendly and PDFPDF
Service Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2012 – Amendment in rule 7
Notification No. 47/2012 ST, DATED 28-9-2012
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax Rules, 1994, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Service Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2012.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in rule 7, in sub-rule (2), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that the Form ‘ST-3′ required to be submitted by the 25th day of October, 2012 shall cover the period between 1st April to 30th June, 2012 only.”