INCOME TAX APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRASINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI AMIT
SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA no.
7737/Mum./2011 – Assessment Year: 2008-09)
Income Tax Officer (Central)
v/s
Mr. Gope M. Rochlani
Date of Order – 24.05.2013
In our considered opinion, once
the legislature has not specified the “due date” as provided in section 139(1)
in Explanation 5A, then by implication, it has to be taken as the date extended
under section 139(4). In view of the above, we hold that the assessee gets the
benefit / immunity under clause (b) of Explanation to section 271(1)(c) because
the assessee has filed its return of income within the “due date” and,
therefore, the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer cannot be sustained on
this ground. Even though we are not affirming the findings and the conclusions
of the learned Commissioner (Appeals), however, as per the discussion made
above, penalty is deleted in view of the interpretation of Explanation 5A to
section 271(1)(c). Consequently, the ground raised by the Revenue is treated as
dismissed.
No comments:
Post a Comment